[K5pbem] Changes to the Mailing List

[Michael Surbrook]

On Nov 10, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Chuk Goodin wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:52:44PM -0800, Jeff Skagen wrote:
>> Y'know, at first I thought this was a good idea, but the more I  
>> think about
>> it, the more I don't really see much point to it. If someone isn't
>> interested anymore, it's easy enough to unsubscribe. And if they  
>> aren't
>> interested anymore but are too lazy to unsubscribe, well, so what?  
>> It's not
>> hurting us to keep sending them messages from the list. But if we  
>> delete
>> anyone who doesn't respond in a set time, we may inadvertently  
>> prune some
>> lurkers who are interested but not active on the list or are away  
>> for a
>> time, or whatever. So unless there's some other reason I can't  
>> think of for
>> some list housekeeping, I think we should leave all the current list
>> subscribers on it. Just my 2 cents.
>
> I'm definitely a lurker myself, but I'd rather not get left off --  
> can we
> still respond if we don't even have a character?

Yes. I won't delete anyone off of the list -- unless I am getting  
bounces from a non-existent address or some such.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Surbrook
susano at guisarme . net http://surbrook.devermore.net/index/index.html

"I cannot live without books"

Thomas Jefferson